Awaiting reviewer selection sample. " This status has not been changed for a month.

Awaiting reviewer selection sample This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Add a 4. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ page for the selected submission Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. 18 Submit 9. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, whether you want to prepare offline or Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. " My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Reviewer status and be badged as a training graduate on our reviewer selection system, making it more likely that you will be selected to review. When you review a paper you read a manuscript critically, and start to realize potential criticisms reviewers might have of your future papers. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. Share. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence. What does it mean if the status date changes while the status remains with editor? Question. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for conce • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. In this step, the scientific editor decides whether the article should be rejected or should The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, reviewers are selected on an ad hoc basis and may have no connection with either the journal or the Society. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. View. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. This is a Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Improve this I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. Can you please explain what it is going on? It looks like the editor wanted another opinion about the paper, and the next morning new potential reviewers were selected and emails were sent off. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. I for example look at my assignments once a week. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. – Jon Custer. The editor then selects individual candidates to be added to the submission as Invited, Assigned, Alternate, or Proposed. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara. Does it mean the work will The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. 9. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Editor here. The statute of De Nederlandsche Bank is currently being amended. 24 Awaiting I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. But today I noticed that the status changed again and it says 'Awaiting Reviewer Agreement'. This may involve checking that the submission is within the journal's scope and adheres to submission guidelines. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Does anyone have any idea why Abstract. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. The status of the paper changed several times. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Generally, the retrieval-based approach is usually applied in the one-to-several reviewer assignment scenarios, i. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. 6. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. I have submitted a perspective article. The rest of the lines were already covered in the other post, like the strange double entry of “Decision Made. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Answer. Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. Thirty-five articles (25 studies) met inclusion criteria; two rated moderate in quality; 12 described cohort designs; 17 described interventions in remote/very remote communities; none focused on urban communities; and 11 reported moderate or strong Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. OR. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. For example, if the submission only has • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Dec 3, 2015 9:59:30 GMT -5 . And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. Awaiting reviewers scores simply mean the article is with the reviewers and the journal office is waiting for the Does the status 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' mean that the manuscript has passed desk rejection by the editor? A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). Hi. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. You may learn more through this similar related query: What does the journal status "Awaiting reviewer reply" mean? The present methodological literature review (cf. user32537 user32537. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision Selecting and Inviting Reviewers 1. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow For example, the editor or the editor's assistant might have reset the number of Maybe. If corrections of minor errors such as undersized captions, font size, and misspellings would make the paper of longer-term value, it should be accepted after the corrections. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Reviewers are not always accurate with their comments and sometimes editors intervene, for example, to seek another opinion. There is no set time for this to take. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. Follow this Question. online-publication; Share. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. comment on how well the authors addressed the concerns of the other previous reviewers as well, or if you agree or disagree with the feedback from the other reviewers (based on the response to reviewers provided by the authors). The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". If so, the associate editor (AE) now needs to look for peer reviewers again. Some editorial systems give the Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. 21, awaiting AE decision. ; The Statute of Uses three centuries after the Statutes of Mortmain would attempt, with only partial success to end the practice of cestui que use. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Role of the journal editor. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 "Awaiting AE I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. When the It is important to acknowledge that several organizations are already addressing some of the limitations identified in this study through specialized AI-powered reviewer selection tools. ai's Referee Finder, Global Campus AI, and Dimensions. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Click on “Take Action. Do not email to ask about AE stands for Associate Editor. It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. Review and selection of manuscripts. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Review Settings . I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. ). This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. This may, however, vary across journals. One or more may have pulled out from the review due to issues over availability, a mismatch with their subject area, or a conflict of interest. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. آیا مقاله من برای داوری رد شده است؟ اکنون، پس از امتیازات داور و پس از انتظار، وضعیت “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” و “Awaiting Final Decision “را با هم نشان می دهد I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. If, for example, claims are made about cross-linguistic influence from a particular language X Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. However, a chapter prepared in Word will be longer than on the final printed page. I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. But the whole selection process needs to have a sense of experience and not just simply overlooking it. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Reviewer Scores'. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. Commented Oct 18, 2023 at 12:39. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Our entire research enterprise would stop functioning without Reviewers. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews Submission System says „awaiting reviewer selection“ since I submitted 3 months ago. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation Reviewers are urged to seriously consider the criteria outlined above when reviewing a paper. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded Editorial Manager (EM) offers several different search options and tools for locating and selecting reviewers. You are not required to grant their request. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. " This status has not been changed for a month. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. 1. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. While we typically The statute of “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” lasted for more than one year. The journal told me ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. 2. For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. I have previously published in the same journal Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers T horax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year. Then I revised and resubmitted. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers by appropriate control groups. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: If all the reviewers from the last round are invited, they should be kept in the same order. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. , 2020) addresses this void and aims to identify the dominant approaches to sample selection and provide insights into essential choices in this step of AE stands for "Associate Editor. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. As 3 months have past after re-submission, and the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” for more than 1 month, I am going to send an inquiry to the journal. However, I definitely remember the last two: The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. If a paper satisfies all the above criteria, it should be accepted. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Failing to take up references. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. However, I just noticed that the status of my Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. The reviewer has accepted the invitation However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. For example, reviewer #2 in To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". patience is key Guest. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers Awaiting Reviewer Selection. ' However, I'm Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. Not sure if the previous reviewer rejected it or had conflicting opinions, need to include a The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. t backed up) The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). What does it mean? It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. ai's Reviewer Finder. " Your manuscript was sent for peer review, but not all the reviewers got back with the review. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation the consistency of its scientific methodology and the sample used; as well as its relevance and whether it’s bibliography is up to date. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". This chapter reviews the journal submission and review process, starting with navigating manuscript submission sites and proceeding through editorial review, peer review, editorial decisions, revising and resubmitting manuscripts, developing reviewer response letters, finalizing manuscripts, and correcting publisher proofs. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. The ‘-7’ indicated Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations A mentor's voice for younger or inexperienced candidates is a prime example of this. Aguinis et al. 23 Resubmitted 10. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. Improve this answer. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. Once the search has been run, the results appear as a candidate list. I didnt see the "under review "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. ” A second example table I’ll show you is one where the paper was eventually . A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other Peer reviewers selected by keywords* Desk Reject Checked for compliance with journal guidelines *Tip: make sure the keywords in For example, are the keywords broad enough to lure in readers with a broad interest in the topic but narrow enough to accurately reflect the For example, if there are going to be 10 chapters in a 350-page book the average chapter length will be 35 pages. e. log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Locate the manuscript using the Quick Search or “Manuscripts Awaiting Revision” queue. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Asked by Hend Okasha on 01 May, 2021 . Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. I wrote the editorial assistant, he answered paper is under review, but doesn’t know when decision will take The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. This ensures that we receive as wide a mix of views on the manuscript as possible. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Examples include Prophy. , selecting several reviewers from the candidate reviewers database for one paper at each time, a common example is the reviewer assignment process of papers submitted to the journals. By contrast, the matching-based approach is Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . Click the blue “Take Action The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. ; His most important contribution to the statute book is The Statute of Frauds. Thank you. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. It has been noted that selection processes sometimes fail to check prospective employee references and background checks. Several of our journals also employ a panel of reviewers who have agreed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. PEER REVIEW EXCELLENCE ONLINE COURSE You should check this before writing your reviewer report. Wait! It is not late yet. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. 19 Awaiting AE Decision 10. Add a comment | -1 . 15-6. Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. For most manuscripts, in the The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers who have not yet completed their reviews. However, on the same day, the Thank you for your question. Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. So, on average, you and your co-authors should collectively provide a similar number of reviews. hzq mmaz vditd ofxdtct anwr wybnau iggfi mzmbgc ryxf widb